Should Compounders Sanitize Their Gloves During a Media-Fill Test?
Should compounders sanitize gloves during a media-fill test? Learn how realistic competency assessments support aseptic technique and USP <797> compliance. Read more
For many sterile compounding teams, hazardous drug (HD) wipe sampling is one of the most intimidating aspects of USP <800>. Even organizations with strong sterile compounding programs often delay implementation—not because they don’t care about safety, but because they’re unsure what wipe sampling will uncover, how results will be interpreted, or how regulators will respond. That hesitation is understandable. But avoiding wipe sampling doesn’t reduce risk, it just leaves it unmeasured. USP <800> wipe sampling isn’t designed to “catch” failures. It exists to confirm whether your hazardous drug controls are doing what they’re supposed to do: containing HD residues to controlled areas. When approached thoughtfully, wipe sampling becomes a tool for confidence, not fear.

What HD wipe sampling is really about
At its core, HD wipe sampling answers a very specific question: Are HD residues being effectively removed from surfaces? As much as we try to contain these residues, they are going to migrate, we know that. So, can we at least say that in places where we expect to find them that they are being removed.
HD wipe sampling evaluates whether:
In other words, wipe sampling measures system performance.
Why sterile compounders are hesitant to start
Across the industry, we hear the same concerns:
These concerns don’t mean a program is weak—they mean leadership understands the weight of occupational safety. The key is recognizing that not knowing doesn’t equal safety. Wipe sampling provides data that allows teams to improve controls before exposure becomes a real problem.
USP <800> expects progress, not perfection
USP <800> does not require zero detectable residue. It encourages assessment, awareness, control, and continuous improvement. Inspectors and surveyors are not expecting organizations to discover nothing. They are looking for evidence that you:
Starting HD wipe sampling—and managing it responsibly—is often viewed more favorably than avoiding it altogether.
How to implement wipe sampling in a way that makes sense
We hope this blog takes you from fear to confidence. HD wipe sampling under USP <800> isn’t about uncovering failure. It’s about confirming control. When implemented thoughtfully, it protects staff, strengthens HD operations, and demonstrates regulatory maturity.
Should compounders sanitize gloves during a media-fill test? Learn how realistic competency assessments support aseptic technique and USP <797> compliance. Read more
USP <797> provides a comprehensive framework for sterile compounding—but it does not function as an operational playbook. Most organizations are not struggling because they are unaware of the requirements. They struggle in the space between what the chapter says and what daily practice actually looks like. Read more
USP <797> sets clear expectations for preventing contamination in sterile compounding—but compliance alone doesn’t guarantee control. True contamination control depends on how consistently best practices are applied in daily operations, especially in three high impact areas: garbing and hand hygiene, material transfer, and cleanroom behavior. Read more
